Pathologically confirmed diffuse alveolar haemorrhage in lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 40-year-old woman was referred to pulmonology after presenting with dyspnoea and self-limiting haemoptysis. Chest CT revealed diffuse ground glass opacities and small thin-walled cysts. Bronchoalveolar lavage cultures were negative and cytology revealed haemosiderin-laden macrophages. Transthoracic echocardiogram was normal. Connective tissue disease and vasculitis work-up were negative. Vascular endothelial growth factor-D level was indeterminate. Lung function was normal. She underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy. In addition to findings consistent with lymphangioleiomyomatosis, histopathological examination identified haemosiderosis without capillaritis, confirming a diagnosis of diffuse alveolar haemorrhage in the context of the associated clinical and radiographic features. Follow-up imaging after 5 months showed resolution of the diffuse ground glass opacities. Pharmacotherapy with sirolimus was not initiated due to absence of deterioration in pulmonary function. Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis is a rare but important presentation. The few previously reported cases progressed to respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".