MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214207055 · doi:10.17816/jowd87229

The complete management of pelvic prolapse by laparoscopic promontofixation & modified burch Colposuspension

2005· article· en· W3214207055 on OpenAlexaff
Arnaud Wattiez, R. Botchorishvili, Michel Canis, B. Rabischong, JL Pouly, G. Mage

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of obstetrics and women s diseases · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSex organUterine prolapseRectal prolapseGeneral surgerySurgeryUrologyRectum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Genital prolapse is a common problem in women. About 50% of parous women are estimated to have some form of pelvic organ prolapse, with 10% to 30% requesting treatment of their symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of obstetrics and women s diseasesSame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207