BOPAL 2.0 and a study of tRNA and rRNA gene evolution in <i>Clostridium</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present BOPAL 2.0, an improved version of the BOPAL algorithm for the evolutionary history inference of tRNA and rRNA genes in bacterial genomes. Our approach can infer complete evolutionary scenarios and ancestral gene orders on a phylogeny and considers a wide range of events such as duplications, deletions, substitutions, inversions and transpositions. It is based on the fact that tRNA and rRNA genes are often organized in operons/clusters in bacteria, and this information is used to help identify orthologous genes for each genome comparison. BOPAL 2.0 introduces new features, such as a triple-wise alignment step, context-aware singleton matching and a second pass of the algorithm. Evaluation on simulated datasets shows that BOPAL 2.0 outperforms the original BOPAL in terms of the accuracy of inferred events and ancestral genomes. We also present a study of the tRNA/rRNA gene evolution in the Clostridium genus, in which the organization of these genes is very divergent. Our results indicate that tRNA and rRNA genes in Clostridium have evolved through numerous duplications, losses, transpositions and substitutions, but very few inversions were inferred.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".