Identification of Immune-Related Key Genes in Ovarian Cancer Based on WGCNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer (OV) is a fatal gynecologic malignancy and has poor survival rate in women over the age of forty. In our study, we aimed to identify genes related to immune microenvironment regulations and explore genes associated with OV prognosis. Methods: The RNA-seq data of GDC TCGA Ovarian Cancer cohort of 376 patients was retrieved from website. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and ESTIMATE algorithm were applied to identify the key genes associated with the immune scores. The correlation between key genes and 22 immune cell types were estimated by using CIBERSORT algorithms. Results: WGCNA showed that the pink module was most correlated with the immune score. Seven of 14 key genes (FCRL3, IFNG, KCNA3, LY9, PLA2G2D, THEMIS, and TRAT1) were significantly associated with the OS of OV patients. Correlation analysis showed our key genes positively related to M1 macrophages, CD8 T cells, plasma cells, regulatory T (Treg) cells and activated memory CD4 T cells, and negatively related to naive CD4 T cells, M0 macrophages, activated dendritic cells (DCs) and memory B cells. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that lower abundances of neutrophils and higher abundances of M1 macrophages, plasma cells, T cells gamma delta (γδT) cells and follicular helper T (Tfh) cells predicted better OV prognosis. Conclusion: Forteen key genes related to the immune infiltrating of OV were identified, and seven of them were significantly related to prognosis. These key genes have potential roles in tumor infiltrating immune cells differentiation and proliferation. This study provided potential prognostic markers and immunotherapy targets for OV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".