MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214263961 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3075578

Performance Analysis of Delay Distribution and Packet Loss Ratio for Body-to-Body Networks

2021· article· en· W3214263961 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaolong Li, Jun Cai, Junfeng Yang, Liyong Guo, Shaonian Huang, Yunfei Yi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaEducation Department of Hunan Province
KeywordsComputer scienceEnd-to-end delayNode (physics)Quality of serviceNetwork packetMarkov chainProcessing delayPacket lossTransmission delayComputer networkProbability distributionComputationCoverage probabilityReal-time computingAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the increasing wide applications of wearable wireless networks, body-to-body networks (BBNs) have become significantly important to provide timely and reliable data delivery services. For a specific BBN, assessing its theoretically achievable Quality of Service (QoS) is necessary, especially on the key performance metrics of end-to-end delay distribution and packet loss ratio. The existing analysis models in the literature mainly focused on 1-D space scenarios. In this article, BBN in a 2-D area is considered, where mobile nodes freely and stochastically move along lanes. By introducing two new definitions: 1) node entrance probability and 2) network entrance probability, a systematically analytical framework for end-to-end delay distribution and packet loss ratio is presented. The proposed analytical framework is built on three critical techniques: 1) the Markov chain to model node behaviors; 2) the first passage theory to calculate node entrance probability and network entrance probability; and 3) the central limit theory to decrease the computation time for summing up per-hop delay. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of our proposed analysis model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207