MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214270297 · doi:10.1039/d1qi01348c

Regulating the lattice strain of platinum–copper catalysts for enhancing collaborative electrocatalysis

2021· article· en· W3214270297 on OpenAlexaff
Fangfang Chang, Yongpeng Liu, Qing Zhang, Zhichao Jia, Xiaolei Wang, Lin Yang, Zhengyu Bai

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry Frontiers · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsElectrocatalystCatalysisCopperPlatinumAlloyOxygen reductionStrain (injury)Materials scienceChemistryInorganic chemistryMetallurgyElectrochemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pt n Cu 100− n alloy nanostellates showed the high catalytic activity for both the oxygen reduction and alcohol oxidation reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic Chemistry FrontiersSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207