Variational assimilation of surface wave data for bathymetry reconstruction. Part I: algorithm and test cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate mapping of ocean bathymetry is needed for effective modelling of ocean dynamics, such as tsunami prediction. Available bathymetry data does not always provide the resolution to model such nonlinear waves accurately, and collection of accurate data is logistically challenging. As an alternative, in this study we develop and evaluate a variational data assimilation scheme for the one-dimensional nonlinear shallow water equations that estimates bathymetry using a finite set of observations of surface wave height. We demonstrate that convergence to exact bathymetry is improved by including more observation locations and by implementing a low-pass filter in the data assimilation algorithm to remove small-scale noise. A necessary condition for convergence of the bathymetry reconstruction is that the amplitude of the initial conditions is less than 1% of the bathymetry height. We use density-based global sensitivity analysis (GSA) to assess the sensitivity of the surface wave and reconstruction error to model parameters. By demonstrating low sensitivity of the surface wave to the reconstruction error, we show that reconstructing the bathymetry with a relative error of about 10% is sufficiently accurate for surface wave modelling in most cases. These results can be used to guide the development of similar assimilation schemes in higher dimensions and more realistic geometries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".