MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214296457 · doi:10.18280/mmep.080517

Early Identification of COVID-19 Using Dynamic Fuzzy Rule Based System

2021· article· en· W3214296457 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammed Imran Basheer Ahmed, Atta Rahman, Mehwash Farooqui, Fatimah Alamoudi, Raghad Baageel, Amjad Alqarni

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaceSore throatIdentification (biology)DiseaseFuzzy logicMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health careComputer scienceTable (database)Test (biology)Data miningArtificial intelligencePathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The undergoing research aims to address the problem of COVID-19 which has turned out to be a global pandemic. Despite developing some successful vaccines, the pace has not overcome so far. Several studies have been proposed in the literature in this regard, the present study is unique in terms of its dynamic nature to adapt the rules by reconfigurable fuzzy membership function. Based on patient’s symptoms (fever, dry cough etc.) and history related to travelling, diseases/medications and interactions with confirmed patients, the proposed dynamic fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) identifies the presence/absence of the disease. This can greatly help the healthcare professionals as well as laymen in terms of disease identification. The main motivation of this paper is to reduce the pressure on the health services due to frequent test assessment requests, in which patients can do the test anytime without the need to make reservations. The main findings are that there is a relationship between the disease and the symptoms in which some symptoms can indicate the probability of the presence of the disease such as high difficulty of breathing, cough, sore throat, and so many more. By knowing the common symptoms, we developed membership functions for these symptoms, and a model generated to distinguish between infected and non-infected people with the help of survey data collected. The model gave an accuracy of 88.78%, precision of 72.22%, sensitivity of 68.42%, specificity of 93.67%, and an f1-score of 69.28%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207