MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214304248 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2115116118

CRISPR-SID: Identifying EZH2 as a druggable target for desmoid tumors via in vivo dependency mapping

2021· article· en· W3214304248 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Naert, Dieter Tulkens, Tom Van Nieuwenhuysen, Joanna Przybył, Suzan Demuynck, Matt van de Rijn, Mushriq Al‐Jazrawe, Benjamin A. Alman, Paul Coucke, Kim De Leeneer, Christian Vanhove, Savvas N. Savvides, David Creytens, Kris Vleminckx

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Cancer InstituteBijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGentStand Up To CancerVlaamse regeringUniversiteit GentFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAgentschap Innoveren en OndernemenKom op tegen KankerAgentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en TechnologieDesmoid Tumor Research Foundation
KeywordsCRISPRDruggabilityWnt signaling pathwayComputational biologyBiologyCancer researchCarcinogenesisGenome editingGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance CRISPR-SID was established in the diploid frog Xenopus tropicalis for in vivo elucidation of cancer cell vulnerabilities. CRISPR-SID uses deep-learning predictions and binomial theory to identify genes under positive or negative selection during autochthonous tumor development. Using CRISPR-SID in a genetic model for desmoid tumors, treatment-recalcitrant mesenchymal tumors driven by hyperactivation of the Wnt signaling pathway, we identified EZH2 and SUZ12 , both encoding critical components of the polycomb repressive complex 2, as dependency genes for desmoid tumors. Finally, we demonstrate the promise of EZH2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for desmoid tumors. With the simplicity of CRISPR sgRNA multiplexing in Xenopus embryos, the CRISPR-SID method may be applicable to reveal vulnerabilities in other tumor types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207