MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214311899 · doi:10.1115/imece2001/nde-25815

Inspection of Fastener Holes Using Ultrasonic Phased Arrays

2001· article· en· W3214311899 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFastenerPhased arrayUltrasonic sensorDeflection (physics)Ultrasonic testingCorrosionNondestructive testingMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringAcousticsElectrical engineeringOpticsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An Air Force Aging Aircraft Project was initiated to identify a suitable replacement for the Autoscan. The Autoscan is a unique piece of equipment that was originally identified for specific inspections for detection of first-layer, faying surface fatigue cracks (.030″ and larger) around fastener holes beneath the fastener heads, without removal of the fastener. The currently inspected parent material ranges from .125 to .3 inches thick, 2024T3 or 7075-T73 aluminum. Potential also exists for replacing other aging inspection equipment such as the Rotoscan. A secondary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of expanding the inspection capabilities to detect corrosion as well as cracks. A Trade Study was conducted initially to consider existing technologies available, trade-offs, and technology insertion in order to meet the required performance parameters. The trade study showed Phased Array Ultrasonics to have the greatest potential, so it was chosen as the inspection method to pursue. Using phased arrays, a novel inspection technique for rapidly and reliably inspecting the area around fastener holes for cracks and corrosion has been developed with no moving parts. Specially designed probes are used for the aircraft inspections. This design consists of a three-dimensional matrix of 504 ultrasonic elements on a cone that encircles the fastener head. The two-dimensional arrangement of elements permits deflection of the ultrasonic beam in three dimensions. Full circumferential scans are performed by programming the phased array focal laws to scan 360° of the fastener holes, using a combination of the following scan patterns: pulse-echo at 45° incident on the crack, pulse-echo at 90°, pitch-catch, plus local scanning. This capability allows flexible coverage of the fastener hole and surrounding area, again with no moving parts. Additionally, the beam deflection capability means that one probe is adaptable to a wide range of fastener diameters and skin thickness. Several conical sub-arrays were built to evaluate the feasibility of the concept experimentally. The experimental results along with numerical modeling were used to determine optimal values for inner and outer radii of the cone, angle of the cone, number of elements and arrangement of the elements. A complete prototype conical array was subsequently built. The final portion of this project includes developing the specific inspection procedures, and performing a Probability of Detection study (POD) developed by the FAA’s Airworthiness Assurance Nondestructive Tested Validation Center at Sandia National Laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207