Exploring the effects of a communication partner training programme for adapted transport drivers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Public transportation plays an essential role in the social participation of people living with a communication disability. However, the attitudes and communication skills of public transport drivers may influence access to the service. A communication partner training programme offered to public transportation staff may help drivers better interact with people living with a communication disability.Aims To explore the effects of communication partner training on adapted transport drivers: 1) knowledge about communication and strategies to use with persons living with a communication disability, 2) relational communication, and 3) communication behaviours with passengers living with a communication disability in authentic communication contexts.Methods & Procedures An exploratory single group naturalistic design was used. Thirteen drivers were provided with a novel communication partner training programme. Participants’ knowledge about communication with individuals living with a communication disability was assessed with written situational scenarios presenting passengers with either an expressive, receptive, or pragmatic communication profile. Videos of the participants interacting with passengers living with a communication disability during real-life trips were captured and analysed using the Relational Communication Scale. The videos were further analysed to determine if the participants’ use of gestures had changed after training. Paired-sample t-tests were undertaken for each measure to identify any post-training changes.Outcomes & Results Drivers’ knowledge about communication with people living with a communication disability significantly increased after training. Also, significant behavioural changes occurred in drivers post-training videos as indicated by the better evaluation of all dimensions of the Relational Communication Scale and the increased use of gestures. Emblematic gestures were the most frequently employed.Conclusions This study suggests that the communication partner training programme for adapted transport drivers could improve their communication with people living with a communication disability. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings and further determine their external validity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it