MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214381038 · doi:10.1109/jsait.2021.3126687

On Streaming Codes With Unequal Error Protection

2021· article· en· W3214381038 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdi Haghifam, M. Nikhil Krishnan, Ashish Khisti, Xiaoqing Zhu, Wai-Tian Tan, John Apostolopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork packetConverseCoding (social sciences)Packet lossForward error correctionComputer networkAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceDecoding methodsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Error control codes for real-time interactive applications such as audio and video streaming must operate under strict delay constraints and be resilient to burst losses. Previous works have characterized optimal streaming codes that guarantee perfect and timely recovery of all source packets when the burst loss is below a certain maximum threshold. In this work, we generalize the notion of streaming codes to the unequal error protection (UEP) setting. Toward this end, we define two natural notions of streaming codes; symbol-level UEP and packet-level UEP. In the symbol-level UEP, the symbols within each source packet have varying recoverability requirements. In the packet-level UEP scenario, packets at even time slots and odd time slots have different recovery guarantees. We discuss practical motivations for both settings and develop coding schemes. We establish optimality or near-optimality guarantees through information-theoretic converse bounds. Simulations over Gilbert and Fritchman channels show that our coding schemes outperform baseline schemes over a wide range of channel parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information TheorySame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207