MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214402306

Loi du 27/02/2003 portant assentiment au protocole de montreal n 4 portant modification de la convention pour l'unification de certaines regles relatives au transport aerien international, signee a varsovie le 12 octobre 1929, amendee par le protocole, fait a la haye le 28 septembre 1955, signe a montreal le 25 septembre 1975 (2)

2003· article· fr· W3214402306 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
commerce exterieur et cooperation au developpement

Bibliographic record

Venueetaamb.openjustice.be · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesUnificationArtComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

27 fevrier 2003 : loi portant assentiment au protocole de montreal n 4 portant modification de la convention pour unification de certaines regles relatives au transport aerien international signee a varsovie le 12 octobre 1929 amendee par le protocole fait a la haye le 28 septembre 1955 signe a montreal le 25 septembre 1975 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0210.016
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1100.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueetaamb.openjustice.beSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207