MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214447927 · doi:10.1109/ius52206.2021.9593605

Make the most of MUST, an open-source Matlab UltraSound Toolbox

2021· article· en· W3214447927 on OpenAlexaff
Damien Garcia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersCentre Lyonnais d'Acoustique, Université de LyonAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsComputer scienceBeamformingToolboxMATLABUltrasoundTransducerArtificial intelligenceAcousticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medical ultrasound imaging requires recurring use of elementary principles, namely, the choice of the transducer, the design of the emitted waves and their wavefronts (e.g. focused or wide), the demodulation of the received signals, their beamforming, and their post-processing to generate B-mode or flow images. The ultrasound signals used for research purposes can be synthetic or acquired. To make the whole pipeline easily accessible to many researchers and students, the objective was to provide an open-access toolbox, widely documented, and adapted to ultrasound imaging research involving experimental or simulation methods. The MUST Matlab UltraSound Toolbox contains algorithms that focus on the development, simulation, and analysis of ultrasound signals for medical imaging. The user can design various ultrasound-imaging scenarios and analyze their performance using simulated or acquired data. The MUST functions allow studying the characteristics of transducers and waveforms, analyze signals, and construct ultrasound images. The many examples provide a starting point for students and researchers to quickly gain an understanding of the essentials of ultrasound imaging. The simulators integrated into MUST provide very realistic acoustic pressure fields and ultrasound images. The Matlab MUST toolbox is freely available at https://www.biomecardio.com/MUST. Before engaging in advanced ultrasound techniques and comparing them with so-called standard methods, it is necessary to have a good understanding of the latter and their advantages and limitations. With this in mind, the MUST toolbox includes everything needed for comprehensive ultrasound imaging: simulators of acoustic pressure fields and backscattered RF signals, delay-and-sum beamforming, B-mode imaging, wall filtering, color or vector Doppler, speckle tracking … The documentation and open access facilitate easy and intuitive use. If the MUST toolbox proves to be interesting, the author plans to integrate advanced features depending on the demands of the ultrasound community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0920.082

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207