On the Evaluation of the Eigendecomposition of the Airy Integral Operator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distributions of the $k$-th largest level at the soft edge scaling limit of Gaussian ensembles are some of the most important distributions in random matrix theory, and their numerical evaluation is a subject of great practical importance. One numerical method for evaluating the distributions uses the fact that they can be represented as Fredholm determinants involving the so-called Airy integral operator. When the spectrum of the integral operator is computed by discretizing it directly, the eigenvalues are known to at most absolute precision. Remarkably, the Airy integral operator is an example of a so-called bispectral operator, which admits a commuting differential operator that shares the same eigenfunctions. In this manuscript, we develop an efficient numerical algorithm for evaluating the eigendecomposition of the Airy integral operator to full relative precision, using the eigendecomposition of the commuting differential operator. This allows us to rapidly evaluate the distributions of the $k$-th largest level to full relative precision rapidly everywhere except in the left tail, where they are computed to absolute precision. In addition, we characterize the eigenfunctions of the Airy integral operator, and describe their extremal properties in relation to an uncertainty principle involving the Airy transform. We observe that the Airy integral operator is fairly universal, and we describe a separate application to Airy beams in optics. Using the eigenfunctions, we compute a finite-energy Airy beam that is optimal, in the sense that the beam is both maximally concentrated, and maximally non-diffracting and self-accelerating.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".