MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214483686 · doi:10.11648/j.ajee.20210904.12

Experimental Study of the Annual Operation of an Air-soil Heat Exchanger in Ouagadougou

2021· article· en· W3214483686 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Boureima Kaboré, Germain Wende Pouiré Ouedraogo, Boukaré Ouedraogo, Sié Kam, Dieudonné Joseph Bathiébo

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Energy Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWater management and technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat exchangerEnvironmental scienceWork (physics)Geothermal gradientAir temperatureTube (container)InletThermal inertiaThermalPlate heat exchangerMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesWaste managementGeologyMechanical engineeringEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of air-soil heat exchangers for cooling habitats has developed considerably in recent years. An air-soil heat exchanger (ASHE) is a geothermal system that uses the thermal inertia of the soil to heat or cool part of the air to renew a habitat. It is sometimes called a Canadian well or a Provencal well. In this present work, we have presented the experimental prototype implemented in Ouagadougou. It is an air-soil heat exchanger consisting of a U-shaped PVC pipe of horizontal length 15 m, diameter 16 cm and placed at a depth of 1.5m (slope of about 2%) in floor. The experimental work consists in measuring, on the one hand, the temperature of the air from the inlet of the tube to the outlet in steps of 2 m in length and, on the other hand, the temperatures of the ambient air, air in the habitat and soil at 1 m and 1.5 m depth. This study has allowed analyzing the evolution of air temperatures in the system. The thermals performances of air-soil heat exchanger have been also evaluated and his influence on air temperature in the habitat. The results show that the experimental setup is of good quality. In practice, the thermal efficiency is between 20% and 70%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Energy EngineeringSame topicWater management and technologiesFrench-language works237,207