MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The effect of vulvar lichen sclerosus on sexual dysfunction

2021· article· en· W3214520084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V.V. Dunaevskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive health of woman · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenital Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVulvaLichen sclerosusSexual functionSexual intercourseSexual dysfunctionOutpatient clinicGynecologySexual lifePhysical therapyDermatologyInternal medicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory dermathosis that affects the vulva. Many women with LS complain about pain in the vulva, which usually often affects a patient’s life quality. This study describes the results of comparing the sexual function of patients with vulva lichen sclerosis (VLS) with reports of pain and without, to a control group of healthy people.The objective: a determination of the spread of sexual dysfunction in women with VLS.Materials and methods. On the basis of the gynecological office for routine screening / preventive care of the outpatient department in the National Cancer Institute and the clinic “Verum”, a case-control study was carried out to determine the relationship between VLS and sexual dysfunction. A total of 235 women were included in the study. 140 women with a confirmed by biopsy the diagnosis VLS were compared with a control group. We studied the current health complaints, medical and surgical history, current symptoms such as pain and itching, the type and frequency of sexual intercourse and level of satisfaction with sexual activity. The assessment of the severity of pain was carried out according to the McGill scale, the type and frequency of sexual relations and the level of satisfaction with sexual activity - according to the results of questionnaires.Results. Women with VLS reported less sexual activity than women of the control group (p=0.007). In the study, sexually active women with VLS were significantly less likely to report vaginal intercourse (71.6%) than «healthy» controls (89.0%, p=0.003), although similar proportions of all groups indicated that vaginal contact was important for them. Satisfaction with the quality of sexual activity was significantly lower among the women with VLS compared with the control group of «healthy» patients. 25% of women with VLS reported that sexual activity was rarely or never satisfying, compared with 2,11% of the control group of healthy women (p<0.0001).Conclusion. Women with vulva lichen sclerosis have less frequent and less satisfying sexual activity compared to the control group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductive health of womanSame topicGenital Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207