Bibliographic record
Abstract
The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic on March 11th, 2020, and ever since, our world has been turned upside down: replacing “ordinary life” with chaos, uncertainty, and fear. The widespread lockdown measures and closures of schools and daycares mid-March created a crisis of care, where formal and informal care arrangements have been upended, which has left many families on their own to resolve this issue. Since historically, women have shouldered the heaviest weight of the child care burden, and earn on average less than their male counterparts, it has become women and their work that have seen dramatic impacts, including being the ones to step back from their careers to assume the full-time responsibilities during the pandemic. Given the barriers they already face under normal circumstances, the question becomes how have mothers been impacted by the added strain involved with child care, homeschooling and navigating paid work following the pandemic? How will this crisis shed light on the inequalities that persist, namely the cultural expectations for mothers, and gendered norms embedded in carework? Department: Honours Sociology Faculty Mentor: Dr. Joanne Minaker
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".