MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214559626 · doi:10.1137/20m136373x

Graphon Mean Field Games and Their Equations

2021· article· en· W3214559626 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter E. Caines, Minyi Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Control and Optimization · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityMcGill University
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Environment Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsField (mathematics)Mathematical economicsApplied mathematicsCalculus (dental)Mathematical analysisPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of the graphon theory of large networks and their infinite limits has enabled the formulation of a theory of the centralized control of dynamical systems distributed on asymptotically infinite networks. Furthermore, the study of the decentralized control of such systems has been initiated in which graphon mean field games (GMFG) and the GMFG equations have been formulated for the analysis of noncooperative dynamic games on unbounded networks; in that work, existence and uniqueness results have been introduced for the GMFG equations, together with an $\epsilon$-Nash theory for GMFG systems which relates infinite population equilibria on infinite networks to finite population equilibria on finite networks. Those results are rigorously established in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Control and OptimizationSame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207