MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Internal Model Based Speed Estimation and Lyapunov Energy Function Based Control of a Surface Mount PMSM for Electric Vehicle Application

2021· article· en· W3214579881 on OpenAlexaff
Vikram Roy Chowdhury, Sara Yazdani, Dwaipayan Barman, Md Multan Biswas, Dhiman Chowdhury

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Lyapunov functionPowertrainController (irrigation)InverterFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceEngineeringControl engineeringTorqueVoltageControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a speed sensing mechanism of a surface mount permanent magnet synchronous machine based on the internal model principle has been presented for an electric vehicle (EV) application. The current controller of the machine has been implemented adopting Lyapunov energy function based analysis so as to achieve global stability over the full range of operations. Performance of the proposed control come estimation architecture has been tested with an electric vehicle based application. The internal model based estimation determines the back emf of the machine and then by simple algebraic manipulations, the speed of the machine is calculated. An LC filter is connected at the machine terminals after the inverter to avoid impressing pulse width modulated voltage on the machine terminals so as to increase the life span of the machine. The proposed control come estimation architecture is verified via computer simulations using MATLAB/Simulink and PLECS domain and various case study results are presented to prove the efficacy of the control systems. Several case studies have been presented for the motoring as well as regenerative braking mode of the EV powertrain system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207