« Nous aussi, nous aimons la vie quand nous en avons les moyens » : une étude des espaces, pouvoirs et affects dans Le jeu de la musique de Stéfanie Clermont
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article se penche sur les manifestations socio-spatiales des dispositifs capitalistes et patriarcaux dans le recueil de nouvelles Le jeu de la musique de Stéfanie Clermont (2017) ainsi que sur les échappées du régime patriarcal représentées. L’auteure mobilise corollairement les notions de dispositif (Agamben) et de dispositif spatial (Lussault), de même que celles d’hétérotopie (Foucault; Beneventi et Calderón) et de chora sémiotique (Kristeva) pour mieux qualifier les espaces marginaux se développant à l’écart des injonctions patriarcales et capitalistes. Il apparaît que dans des lieux marqués par des signes reliés à la féminité, à l’enfance et à la nature, autant de symboles s’opposant aux normes hétéropatriarcales et de production capitaliste, les personnages féminins parviennent à se délester de la détresse qu’elles vivent dans les spatialités normatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".