MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214642836

아동의 공격성 행동에 더 큰 영향을 미치는 것은 무엇인가? : 가정 내 폭력에 대한 노출인가, 폭력 미디어에 대한 노출인가

2009· article· ko· W3214642836 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
이경혜

Bibliographic record

Venue특수교육재활과학연구 · 2009
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntimate Partner and Family Violence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggressionPsychologyWitnessPopulationPsychological interventionPoison controlDomestic violenceIntervention (counseling)Injury preventionDevelopmental psychologyMedicineMedical emergencyEnvironmental healthPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Child physical aggression has been demonstrated as a critical precursor of academic failure and social-maladjustment problems in adolescents and adults. To better understand the developmental origins of physical aggression, and to identify targets for early preventive interventions, a random sampling of 372 families was carried out, representing an urban Canadian population of two-parent families with diverse socio-economic characteristics. In the longitudinal approach, witness of domestic violence(WDV) and exposure to media violence(EMV) were measured when children were at the age 4. This sample was applied same age in when the children were at the age 5 and in the grade 1 to measure the level of physical aggression(PA). The analysis by structure equation modeling confirmed the linkage between exposure to violence and child physical aggression. The result indicates the physical aggression in the grade 1 were affected by exposure to media violence and witness of domestic violence similarly as were at the age 4, stressing on urgent need for early intervention to the children exposed to violence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue특수교육재활과학연구Same topicIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceFrench-language works237,207