MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214649594 · doi:10.4000/rdctss.971

Mise en œuvre en Pologne de la Directive (UE) 2019/1158 du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 20 juin 2019 concernant l’équilibre entre la vie professionnelle et la vie privée des parents et des aidants

2020· article· fr· W3214649594 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Musiała

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolish Legal and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présente étude a pour objet d’analyser les effets possibles de la mise en œuvre par le législateur polonais de la directive du Parlement européen et du Conseil (UE) 2019/1158 du 20 juin 2019 concernant l’équilibre entre la vie professionnelle et la vie privée des parents et des aidants, abrogeant la directive 2010/18 / UE du Conseil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité socialeSame topicPolish Legal and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207