Finite‐time adaptive fuzzy command filtering control for stochastic nonlinear systems with input quantization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary This article focuses on the finite‐time adaptive fuzzy control problem based on command filtering for stochastic nonlinear systems subject to input quantization. Fuzzy logic systems are employed to estimate unknown nonlinearities. In the control design, the hysteretic quantized input is decomposed into two bounded nonlinear functions, which solves the chattering problem. Meanwhile, an adaptive fuzzy controller is presented by the combination of command filter technique and backstepping control, which eliminates the computational complexity existing in traditional backstepping design. Under the proposed adaptive mechanism, all the closed‐loop signals remain bounded while the desired system performance can be realized within finite time. The main significance of this work is that (1) the filtering error can be solved on the basis of the designed compensating signals; (2) the requirement of adaptive parameters is decreased to only one, which simplifies the controller design process and may improve the control performance. Two simulation examples are used to validity of the developed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it