Unsupervised Grouped Axial Data Modeling via Hierarchical Bayesian Nonparametric Models With Watson Distributions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims at proposing an unsupervised hierarchical nonparametric Bayesian framework for modeling axial data (i.e., observations are axes of direction) that can be partitioned into multiple groups, where each observation within a group is sampled from a mixture of Watson distributions with an infinite number of components that are allowed to be shared across different groups. First, we propose a hierarchical nonparametric Bayesian model for modeling grouped axial data based on the hierarchical Pitman-Yor process mixture model of Watson distributions. Then, we demonstrate that by setting the discount parameters of the proposed model to 0, another hierarchical nonparametric Bayesian model based on hierarchical Dirichlet process can be derived for modeling axial data. To learn the proposed models, we systematically develop a closed-form optimization algorithm based on the collapsed variational Bayes (CVB) inference. Furthermore, to ensure the convergence of the proposed learning algorithm, an annealing mechanism is introduced to the framework of CVB inference, leading to an averaged collapsed variational Bayes inference strategy. The merits of the proposed models for modeling grouped axial data are demonstrated through experiments on both synthetic data and real-world applications involving gene expression data clustering and depth image analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".