Fault Diagnosis of Nonlinear Systems Using a Hybrid-Degree Dual Cubature-based Estimation Scheme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a novel hybrid-degree dual estimation approach based on cubature rules and cubature-based nonlinear filters is proposed for fault diagnosis of nonlinear systems through simultaneous state and time-varying parameter estimation. Our proposed dual nonlinear filtering scheme is developed based on case-dependent cubature rules that are motivated by the following observations and facts, namely (i) dynamic characteristics of nonlinear system states and parameters generally are distinct and posses different degrees of complexities, and (ii) performance of cubature rules depend on the system dynamics and vary due to handling of high-dimensional integrations approximations. For improving the robustness capability of our proposed methodologies modified cubature point propagation method is incorporated. The performance of our proposed dual estimation strategy is demonstrated and evaluated by application to a nonlinear gas turbine engine for addressing the component fault diagnosis problem within an integrated fault detection, isolation and identification framework. Robustness analysis is implemented to verify the capability of our proposed approaches to deal with parametric uncertainties and unmodeled dynamics. Extensive simulation case studies and discussions with respect to component fouling, erosion or abrupt faults are provided to substantiate and justify the superiority of our proposed fault diagnosis methodology when compared to other well-known alternative diagnostic techniques such as the Unscented Kalman Filters (UKF) and Particle Filters (PF) that are commonly available in the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".