Architecture de la salle de classe québécoise : analyse historique et morphologique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but de cet article est de documenter les facteurs qui ont influencé l’évolution particulière des salles de classe au sein des écoles primaires. Dans cette optique, un ensemble de documents d’archives retraçant l’histoire du parc immobilier scolaire québécois depuis la fin du XIXe siècle a été recueilli. Les données amassées ont été analysées à partir d’une classification thématique des unités sémantiques identifiées dans ces textes. Cela a permis de faire émerger, à partir des discours d’un ensemble d’acteurs ayant contribué au processus de définition des espaces scolaires (ex. : architectes, acteurs politiques, administrateurs, etc.), les raisons principales évoquées pour expliquer leurs choix conceptuels selon les époques de construction. Ces motifs ont par la suite été associés aux configurations types de salles de classe identifiées au sein d’un échantillon représentatif de bâtiments d’écoles primaires du Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".