MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214686408 · doi:10.4000/communication.14433

La plateformisation des médias français et le ton du débat public

2021· article· fr· W3214686408 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Inna Lyubareva, Julien Mésangeau, Nadira Boudjani, Imad El Badisy, Laurent Brisson

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les auteurs cherchent à comprendre, d’une part, où et quand l’espace des commentaires sur la plateforme YouTube en vient à être touché par les débats brutaux ou agressifs et, d’autre part, quels facteurs limitent ou favorisent cette agressivité. Pour atteindre cet objectif, ils emploient un dispositif se positionnant à la lisière du traitement automatisé du langage et de l’économie politique des médias. Ils basent leur étude sur 2 209 206 commentaires, dont 1 184 859 se trouvent dans les fils de discussion, répartis dans les espaces de commentaires de 46 090 vidéos. Ces dernières sont issues d’un panel de 57 chaînes de médias français aux catégories institutionnelles et aux positionnements différents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicSocial Media and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207