MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214757493 · doi:10.1115/detc2000/mech-14158

Trajectory Control of Two DOF Closed-Chain Mechanical Systems

2000· article· en· W3214757493 on OpenAlexaff
Longhua Guo, Youfu Li, Wenjun Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ServomotorTrajectoryTorqueFeed forwardComputer scienceOpen-loop controllerControl engineeringFlywheelEngineeringClosed loopControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, we develop some control algorithms for trajectory tracking of two DOF closed-chain mechanical systems separately driven by two servomotors (closed-chain robot), as well as by one CV motor and the other servomotor (so-called hybrid machine) based on their dynamic model. For the former, the exponential stability and validation of PD computed-torque control algorithm are verified for trajectory tracking of both joints and the end-effector of the system. For the latter, a complex PD computed-torque control algorithm with a closed-loop feedback for the servomotor and an open-loop feedforward for the CV motor is proposed. Simulation studies show that the complex PD computed-torque control algorithm is effective when the velocity fluctuation of the CV motor is reduced to 5% by attaching a flywheel on the CV motor shaft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207