La cobertura informativa al Tercer Centenario de El Ingenioso Hidalgo Don Quijote de la Mancha en la prensa mexicana (1903-1905)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En mayo de 1905 se celebraron tres siglos de la publicación de la primera edición de El Ingenioso Hidalgo Don Quijote de la Mancha. La propuesta de celebrar el tercer centenario fue promovida inicialmente en la prensa por periodistas e intelectuales en España y posteriormente en México. El siguiente artículo analiza la cobertura informativa al tercer aniversario de la obra en la prensa mexicana. El objetivo fue identificar festejos, ceremonias y concursos a través de notas publicadas en periódicos, semanarios y revistas. Para obtener la información se utilizó el acervo de la Hemeroteca Digital Nacional de México (HNDM) y se localizaron notas que tratan la organización del homenaje y las fiestas establecidas por eruditos y funcionarios. Los resultados descubren publicaciones, periodistas y corresponsales que reportaron los festejos, y ayudaron a consolidar a Don Quijote como la obra literaria más importante en lengua castellana durante los primeros años del siglo XX.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".