MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214778325 · doi:10.21555/rpc.vi2.2437

La cobertura informativa al Tercer Centenario de El Ingenioso Hidalgo Don Quijote de la Mancha en la prensa mexicana (1903-1905)

2021· article· es· W3214778325 on OpenAlex
Ivan Baruj Vázquez Clavellina

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Panamericana de Comunicación · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Journalism, and Communication History
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En mayo de 1905 se celebraron tres siglos de la publicación de la primera edición de El Ingenioso Hidalgo Don Quijote de la Mancha. La propuesta de celebrar el tercer centenario fue promovida inicialmente en la prensa por periodistas e intelectuales en España y posteriormente en México. El siguiente artículo analiza la cobertura informativa al tercer aniversario de la obra en la prensa mexicana. El objetivo fue identificar festejos, ceremonias y concursos a través de notas publicadas en periódicos, semanarios y revistas. Para obtener la información se utilizó el acervo de la Hemeroteca Digital Nacional de México (HNDM) y se localizaron notas que tratan la organización del homenaje y las fiestas establecidas por eruditos y funcionarios. Los resultados descubren publicaciones, periodistas y corresponsales que reportaron los festejos, y ayudaron a consolidar a Don Quijote como la obra literaria más importante en lengua castellana durante los primeros años del siglo XX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it