MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214781060 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac26bd

TOI-2109: An Ultrahot Gas Giant on a 16 hr Orbit

2021· article· en· W3214781060 on OpenAlexaff
Ian Wong, Avi Shporer, George Zhou, Daniel Kitzmann, Thaddeus D. Komacek, Xianyu Tan, R. Tronsgaard, Lars A. Buchhave, Shreyas Vissapragada, Michael Greklek-McKeon, Joseph E. Rodriguez, John P. Ahlers, Samuel N. Quinn, Elise Furlan, Steve B. Howell, Allyson Bieryla, Kevin Heng, Heather A. Knutson, Karen A. Collins, Kim K. McLeod, P. Berlind, P. Lancaster Brown, M. Calkins, Jerome de Leon, E. Esparza-Borges, Gilbert A. Esquerdo, Akihiko Fukui, Tianjun Gan, Éric Girardin, Crystal L. Gnilka, Masahiro Ikoma, Eric L. N. Jensen, John F. Kielkopf, Takanori Kodama, Seiya Kurita, Kathryn V. Lester, Pablo Lewin, G. Marino, F. Murgas, Norio Narita, Ε. Πάλλη, Richard P. Schwarz, Keivan G. Stassun, Motohide Tamura, Noriharu Watanabe, Björn Benneke, G. Ricker, David W. Latham, R. Vanderspek, Sara Seager, Joshua N. Winn, Jon M. Jenkins, Douglas A. Caldwell, W. Fong, Chelsea X. Huang, Ismael Mireles, Joshua E. Schlieder, Bernie Shiao, J. Villaseñor

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersPrecursory Research for Embryonic Science and TechnologyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceScience Mission DirectorateAmes Research CenterInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Science FoundationEuropean Space AgencyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Institutes of Natural SciencesMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações
KeywordsPhysicsAstronomyOrbit (dynamics)AstrophysicsAstrobiologyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report the discovery of an ultrahot Jupiter with an extremely short orbital period of 0.67247414 ± 0.00000028 days (∼16 hr). The 1.347 ± 0.047 R Jup planet, initially identified by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) mission, orbits TOI-2109 (TIC 392476080)—a T eff ∼ 6500 K F-type star with a mass of 1.447 ± 0.077 M ☉ , a radius of 1.698 ± 0.060 R ☉ , and a rotational velocity of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>sin</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>i</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>*</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>81.9</mml:mn> <mml:mo>±</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.7</mml:mn> </mml:math> km s −1 . The planetary nature of TOI-2109b was confirmed through radial-velocity measurements, which yielded a planet mass of 5.02 ± 0.75 M Jup . Analysis of the Doppler shadow in spectroscopic transit observations indicates a well-aligned system, with a sky-projected obliquity of λ = 1.°7 ± 1.°7. From the TESS full-orbit light curve, we measured a secondary eclipse depth of 731 ± 46 ppm, as well as phase-curve variations from the planet’s longitudinal brightness modulation and ellipsoidal distortion of the host star. Combining the TESS-band occultation measurement with a K s -band secondary eclipse depth (2012 ± 80 ppm) derived from ground-based observations, we find that the dayside emission of TOI-2109b is consistent with a brightness temperature of 3631 ± 69 K, making it the second hottest exoplanet hitherto discovered. By virtue of its extreme irradiation and strong planet–star gravitational interaction, TOI-2109b is an exceptionally promising target for intensive follow-up studies using current and near-future telescope facilities to probe for orbital decay, detect tidally driven atmospheric escape, and assess the impacts of H 2 dissociation and recombination on the global heat transport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207