Human phospho-signaling networks of SARS-CoV-2 infection are rewired by population genetic variants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT SARS-CoV-2 infection hijacks signaling pathways and induces protein-protein interactions between human and viral proteins. Human genetic variation may impact SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 pathology; however, the role of genetic variation in these signaling networks remains uncharacterized. We studied human single nucleotide variants (SNVs) affecting phosphorylation sites modulated by SARS-CoV-2 infection, using machine learning to identify amino acid changes altering kinase-bound sequence motifs. We found 2033 infrequent phosphorylation-associated SNVs (pSNVs) that are enriched in sequence motif alterations, potentially reflecting the evolution of signaling networks regulating host defenses. Proteins with pSNVs are involved in viral life cycle processes and host responses, including regulators of RNA splicing and interferon response, as well as glucose homeostasis pathways with potential associations with COVID-19 co-morbidities. Certain pSNVs disrupt CDK and MAPK substrate motifs and replace these with motifs recognized by Tank Binding Kinase 1 (TBK1) involved in innate immune responses, indicating consistent rewiring of infection signaling networks. Our analysis highlights potential genetic factors contributing to the variation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 and suggests leads for mechanistic and translational studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".