MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3214806797 · doi:10.5194/amt-2021-329

Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO <sub>2</sub> retrieval: impact of version v2.2 improvements and comparisons with OMI and ground-based data

2021· article· en· W3214806797 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jos van Geffen, Henk Eskes, Steven Compernolle, Gaïa Pinardi, Tijl Verhoelst, Jean‐Christopher Lambert, Maarten Sneep, Mark ter Linden, Antje Ludewig, K. F. Boersma, Pepijn Veefkind

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoddard Space Flight CenterEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaInstitut Polaire Français Paul Emile VictorNetherlands Space OfficeNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationInstitut national des sciences de l'UniversUlsan National Institute of Science and TechnologyCarnegie Corporation of New YorkEuropean Space AgencyIndian Institute of Science Education and Research MohaliCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsTroposphereRadianceEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingMeteorologySatelliteOzone Monitoring InstrumentAlbedo (alchemy)Atmospheric sciencesGeographyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is one of the main data products measured by the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) on the Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) satellite, which combines a high signal-to-noise ratio with daily global coverage and high spatial resolution. TROPOMI provides a valuable source of information to monitor emissions from local sources such as power plants, industry, cities, traffic and ships, and variability of these sources in time. Validation exercises of NO2 version v1.2-v1.3 data, however, have revealed that TROPOMI's tropospheric vertical columns (VCDs) are too low by up to 50 % over highly polluted areas. These findings are mainly attributed to biases in the cloud pressure retrieval, the surface albedo climatology and the low resolution of the a-priori profiles derived from global simulations of the TM5-MP chemistry model. This study describes improvements in the TROPOMI NO2 retrieval leading to version v2.2, operational since 1 July 2021. Compared to v1.x, the main changes are: (1) The NO2-v2.2 data is based on version 2 level-1B (ir)radiance spectra with improved calibration, which results in a small and fairly homogeneous increase of the NO2 slant columns of 3 to 4 %, most of which ends up as a small increase of the stratospheric columns; (2) The cloud pressures are derived with a new version of the FRESCO cloud retrieval already introduced in NO2-v1.4, which lead to a lowering of the cloud pressure, resulting in larger tropospheric NO2 columns over polluted scenes with a small but non-zero cloud coverage; (3) For cloud-free scenes a surface albedo correction is introduced based on the observed reflectance, which also leads to a general increase of the tropospheric NO2 columns over polluted scenes of order 15 %; (4) An outlier removal was implemented in the spectral fit, which increases the number of good quality retrievals over the South-Atlantic Anomaly region and over bright clouds where saturation may occur; (5) Snow-Ice information is now obtained from ECMWF weather data, increasing the number of valid retrievals at high latitudes. On average the NO2-v2.2 data have tropospheric VCDs that are between 10 and 40 % larger than the v1.x data, depending on the level of pollution and season; the largest impact is found at mid- and high-latitudes in wintertime. This has brought these tropospheric NO2 closer to OMI observations. Ground-based validation shows on average an improvement of the negative bias of the stratospheric (from −6 % to −3 %), tropospheric (from −32 % to −23 %) and total (from −12 % to −5 %) columns. For individual measurement stations, however, the picture is more complicated, in particular for the tropospheric and total columns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→