MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214824277 · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.11.027

Identifying toggle genes from transcriptome-wide scatter: A new perspective for biological regulation

2021· article· en· W3214824277 on OpenAlexaff
Alessandro Giuliani, Thuy Tien Bui, Mohamed Helmy, Kumar Selvarajoo

Bibliographic record

VenueGenomics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersAgency for Science, Technology and Research
KeywordsBiologyMulticellular organismTranscriptomePseudogeneGeneComputational biologyGeneticsmicroRNAGenomeGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of gene expression variability, especially for cancer and cell differentiation studies, has become important. Here, we investigate transcriptome-wide scatter of 23 cell types and conditions across different levels of biological complexity. We focused on genes that act like toggle switches between pairwise replicates of the same cell type, i.e. genes expressed in one replicate and not expressed in the other, sometimes also referred as ON/OFF genes. The proportion of these toggle genes dramatically increases from unicellular to multicellular organization, especially for development and cancer cells. A relevant portion of toggle switches are non-coding genes: in unicellular systems the most represented classes are tRNA and rRNA, while multicellular systems more frequently show lncRNA, sncRNA and pseudogenes. Notably, disease associated microRNAs (miRNAs), pseudogenes and numerous uncharacterized transcripts are present in both development and cancer cells. On top of the known intrinsic and extrinsic factors, our work indicates toggle genes as a novel collective component creating transcriptome-wide variability. This requires further investigation for elucidating both evolutionary and disease processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.547
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomicsSame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207