Bibliographic record
Abstract
Technological advancements have led to easy and rapid generation and collection of huge volumes of varieties of data from of wide ranges of rich data sources. These big data may be of different levels of veracity, including precise data and imprecise or uncertain data. Embedded in the data are valuable information and useful knowledge that can be discovered by data mining. Discovered information and knowledge may help to build a smart world. In this paper, we present a solution for scalable mining of big data. In particular, we focus on scalable mining of huge volumes of temporal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) data at different granularity levels. Since its outbreak, there have been millions of COVID-19 cases worldwide. These are huge volumes of data, and new cases have been reported every day. Embedded in these COVID-19 data is implicit, previously unknown and potentially useful information and knowledge, which can be discovered by data mining for social good. Analyzing and mining these data helps users (e.g., researchers, civilian) to get better understanding of the disease, and thus take an active role in fighting, controlling, and/or combating the disease. Evaluation results on real-life COVID-19 data show the benefits of our solution in scalable mining of big data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".