Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze Billy-Ray Belcourt’s NDN Coping Mechanisms: Notes from the Field through the concept of the politics of body, utopia, and grief. For Belcourt, race and sexual contradiction are not intangible agendas but physical issues. He foregrounds the body as the actual field on which white heterosexuality discourses are exerted and engraved. Differentiated from other contemporary Canadian aboriginal writers, Belcourt regards the racial and the sexual as not separated but intersected on the axis of colonialism. For him, the indigeneity and the queerness are linguistically constructed on the body by the colonial discourses. Armed with post-structuralism, queer theory, feminism, post-colonialism, and intersectionalism, Belcourt practices, reforms, and revolutionizes the legacy of modernist and postmodernist literary techniques. As a writer of minor literature, he produces the text of symptom which can be a new exit for the congested contemporary world literature. For him minor literature is not confined to the private interests of minorities but touches the whole system, which constructs the unequal and unjust hierarchy and makes the minor literature very political and historical. (Dankook University)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".