Abstract 11378: Reference Intervals of Activated Clotting Time in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Monitoring the anticoagulant effect of heparin is critical to prevent thrombosis and/or bleeding during cardiac surgery. This evaluation is usually performed by assessing the activated clotting time (ACT) with a POC device. Despite the relevance and widespread use of ACT, there are currently limited reference values to use as a target. Furthermore, compared to the adult population, infants have been described with a longer ACT, reinforcing the need to establish a separate reference interval for this segment of the population. Aim: The present work aims to propose reference intervals of ACT in pediatric patients. Methods: We collected data on 155 consecutive patients, ranging in age from 1 day to 18 years, undergoing cardiac surgery from 01-2019 to 01-2021 at Sainte-Justine hospital. Prior to surgery, patients were given UFH as a bolus of 3 mg/kg, and Hemochron Signature Elite ACT+ (Accriva Diagnostics, Inc.) was used to measure ACT before and promptly after heparin injection. Data were subsequently analyzed by using a parametric method. Lower and upper reference limits are the values at the 2.5 and 97.5 percentile, respectively. Results: The ACT before heparin injection followed a normal distribution with a lower reference limit at 85 seconds and an upper limit at 147 seconds compared to the range of 70-120 seconds proposed for the general population. Interestingly, the ACT after heparin bolus exhibited a non-gaussian distribution. Since neonates have been previously described with a greater heparin resistance compared to older infants; patients were separated into two age groups: patients < 1-month of age (Group A; n=31) and patients > 1-month (group B; n=124). Afterward, we performed a log transformation of the ACT values after heparin injection to approximate a Gaussian distribution, yielding mean ACT value of 392 seconds (limits 291-529 seconds) for Group A and 473 seconds (limits 314-996 seconds) for Group B (Welch test p value = 4.4 10 -6 ). No significant difference in ACT values prior to heparin bolus was found between the two groups. Conclusion: Overall, our results provide reference values of ACT measured using an Hemochron device, in a pediatric context, paving the way for improved patient care during cardiac surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".