MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214967921 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2000.860930

Quasi dual-mode resonators

2002· article· en· W3214967921 on OpenAlexaff
Raafat R. Mansour, Shutao Ye, S.F. Peik, V. Dokas, Brian Fitzpatrick

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCOM DEV International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorDual modeHelical resonatorPlanarDielectric resonatorDielectric resonator antennaConstruct (python library)DielectricMode (computer interface)Filter (signal processing)Coupling coefficient of resonatorsElectronic engineeringDual (grammatical number)Computer scienceOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper discusses the concept of using two single-mode resonators to construct a quasi dual-mode resonator that has all the features of traditional dual-mode resonators. Two novel filter structures are presented in this paper that employs this concept; one employs planar type resonators and the other employs dielectric resonators. A new configuration for a single mode dielectric resonator is also proposed in this paper. The use of such type of resonators makes it possible to construct dielectric resonator filters that are much smaller in size than conventional TE/sub 01/ single mode resonators. Measured and theoretical results are presented to verify the concepts proposed in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207