MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215083100 · doi:10.1007/s00023-023-01287-0

Holographic Characterisation of Locally Anti-de Sitter Spacetimes

2023· article· en· W3215083100 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex McGill

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Henri Poincaré · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary (topology)Conformal mapPhysicsAnti-de Sitter spaceMathematical physicsGeometryMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It is shown that an $$(n+1)$$ ( n + 1 ) -dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter solution of the Einstein-vacuum equations is locally isometric to pure anti-de Sitter spacetime near a region of the conformal boundary if and only if the boundary metric is conformally flat and (for $$n \ne 4$$ n ≠ 4 ) the boundary stress–energy tensor vanishes, subject to (i) sufficient (finite) regularity in the metric and (ii) the satisfaction of a conformally invariant geometric criterion on the boundary region. A key tool in the proof is the Carleman estimate of Chatzikaleas and Shao (Commun Math Phys, 2022)—a generalisation of previous work by the author with McGill and Shao in (Class Quant Gravity 38(5), 2020)—which is applied to prove a unique continuation result for the Weyl curvature at the conformal boundary given vanishing to sufficiently high order over the boundary region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales Henri PoincaréSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207