Les Questions socialement vives et l’enseignement des sciences humaines et sociales au Québec : des visées délibératives confrontées au paradoxe curriculaire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à analyser la formation disciplinaire en sciences sociales en s’inspirant de recherches empiriques menées à propos des enjeux controversés en classe – ou « questions publiques controversées » ou encore « questions socialement vives » (QSV). L’article synthétise des travaux sur les visées délibératives de l’enseignement des sciences sociales au moyen de QSV et les effets escomptés de cet enseignement sur les élèves. Il décrit, analyse et critique ensuite l’un des programmes québécois de l’ordre secondaire liés au domaine de l’« univers social », soit le cours d’éducation financière, en tant que cas de figure des prescriptions et contenus curriculaires pouvant faire obstacle au traitement délibératif des QSV en classe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it