Asymmetrical dose-responses shape the evolutionary trade-off between antifungal resistance and nutrient use
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging threat for public health. The success of resistance mutations depends on the trade-off between the benefits and costs they incur. This trade-off is largely unknown and uncharacterized for antifungals. Here, we systematically measure the effect of all amino acid substitutions in the yeast cytosine deaminase Fcy1, the target of the antifungal 5-FC (flucytosine). We identify over 900 missense mutations granting resistance to 5-FC, a large fraction of which appear to act through destabilisation of the protein. The relationship between 5-FC resistance and growth sustained by cytosine deamination is characterized by a sharp trade-off, such that small gains in resistance universally lead to large losses in canonical enzyme function. We show that this steep relationship can be explained by differences in the dose-response functions of 5-FC and cytosine. Finally, we observe the same trade-off shape for the ortholog of FCY1 in Cryptoccocus neoformans , a human pathogen. Our results provide a powerful resource and platform for interpreting drug target variants in fungal pathogens as well as unprecedented insights into resistance-function trade-offs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".