MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215195113 · doi:10.1016/s2352-3018(21)00265-4

Global estimates of viral suppression in children and adolescents and adults on antiretroviral therapy adjusted for missing viral load measurements: a multiregional, retrospective cohort study in 31 countries

2021· article· en· W3215195113 on OpenAlexafffund
Win Min Han, Matthew Law, Matthias Egger, Kara Wools‐Kaloustian, Richard D. Moore, Catherine C. McGowan, Nagalingesawaran Kumarasamy, Sophie Desmonde, Andrew Edmonds, Mary‐Ann Davies, Constantin T. Yiannoutsos, Keri N. Althoff, Claudia P. Cortés, Thahira Jamal Mohamed, Antoine Jaquet, Kathryn Anastos, Jonathan Euvrard, Barbara Castelnuovo, Kate Salters, Lara E. Coelho, Didier Koumavi Ekouévi, Brian Eley, Lameck Diero, Elizabeth Zaniewski, Nathan Ford, Annette H. Sohn, Azar Kariminia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet HIV · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Eye InstituteNational Institute on AgingNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesHealth Resources and Services AdministrationNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesNational Center for Research ResourcesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentWorld Health OrganizationAgency for Healthcare Research and QualityNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineViral loadAntiretroviral therapyRetrospective cohort studyPediatricsCohort studyCohortHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Environmental healthVirologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations112
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet HIVSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207