MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215235576 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v44i2.6133

La utopía a prueba: formas heterogéneas de vida en Eugenia de Eduardo Urzaiz

2021· article· es· W3215235576 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jorge Quintana-Navarrete

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCultural and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo analiza la relación entre vida y utopía en Eugenia. Esbozo novelesco de costumbres futuras (1919) de Eduardo Urzaiz. Partiendo de nociones como utopía crítica (Moylan) y utopía experimental (Abensour), el artículo explora cómo la novela de Urzaiz desoculta sistemáticamente las ambivalencias y contradicciones inherentes a las sociedades eugenésicas. Estos casos de contradicción revelan que la vida, a pesar de las tecnologías que intentan codificar su devenir constante, es en realidad un flujo que excede cualquier forma preestablecida. Eugenia pone en escena la existencia de formas-de-vida (Agamben) que buscan desactivar el control biopolítico de los cuerpos y poblaciones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Canadiense de Estudios HispánicosSame topicCultural and Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207