MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215272491

The decommissioning of the Denison uranium facilities in Elliot Lake

2006· article· en· W3215272491 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian Ludgate, Pierre Primeau, R Laliberte, R Pedlar

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear decommissioningUranium mineUraniumUranium oreCommissionEnvironmental scienceMining engineeringWaste managementGeologyEngineeringPhysicsLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Denison uranium facilities consisted of the Denison, Stanrock and Can-Met mines. The Denison mine operated continuously from 1957 through to 1992, while the Stanrock and Can- met mines had discontinuous operations. Several other mines in the Elliot Lake area were also developed in the mid 1950's to supply uranium primarily to the United States Atomic Energy Commission. From the 1970s to the 1990s, the Denison mine supplied uranium to electrical power generating facilities; however, the cancellation of the Ontario Hydro contracts resulted in the closure of the Denison mine in 1992. All of the Denison uranium facilities were decommissioned between 1992 and 1998 and have been in a state of monitoring, care and maintenance since that time. The purpose of this paper is to describe the decommissioning activities for each site, the monitoring programs in place and water quality improvements that have occurred since decommissioning was completed. (author)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.470
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207