MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215304470

Effect of dietary energy and protein density on body composition, attainment of puberty, and ovarian follicular dynamics in dairy heifers.

2003· article· en· W3215304470 on OpenAlex
Prasanth K. Chelikani, D.J. Ambrose, J.J. Kennelly

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDefault journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsAgriculture Food and Rural DevelopmentUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFollicular phaseEndocrinologyAnimal scienceInternal medicineComposition (language)BiologyBody weightEstrous cycleMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objectives were to examine the effects of dietary energy and protein density on age and body composition at puberty, and on ovarian follicular dynamics during the pre- and peripubertal periods in Holstein heifers. In Phase 1, heifers were randomly allotted (n=10 per diet) at 100 kg body weight (BW) to diets with either low (P1L), medium (P1M) or high (P1H) energy and protein formulated for an average daily gain (ADG) of 0.5, 0.8 or 1.1 kg per day, respectively. During Phase 2 (P2), all heifers were fed ad libitum a common diet formulated for an ADG of 0.8 kg per day. Half the animals within the high (n=5) and low groups (n=5) entered P2 either at 12 months of age (P2H-12; P2L-12) or at 330 kg BW (P2H-330; P2L-330). Heifers fed P1H, P1M, P1L, and P2L-12 diets attained puberty at approximately 9, 11, 16, and 14 months of age, respectively (P 0.10). Compared to P1L heifers, P1H heifers had high amplitude LH pulses at 8 months, and high frequency low amplitude LH pulses at 10 months of age (P

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it