Hemisphere-Dependent Ictal Tachycardia Versus Ictal Bradycardia in a Critically Ill Patient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY: Tachycardia is a common ictal phenomenon; however, ictal bradycardia is less commonly reported and rarely presents as ictal asystole/syncope. In critically ill patients, seizures are much less likely to manifest with overt clinical signs, i.e., are more likely to be subtle or nonconvulsive. In this setting, changes in heart rate may be the only clue that seizures are occurring. The authors report an exemplary case of a 78-year-old right-handed man who presented with spontaneous left frontal intraparenchymal hemorrhages. During standard clinical monitoring in the Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, the patient had discrete paroxysms of relative sinus tachycardia, independent episodes of sinus bradycardia, and 3 to 4 seconds of sinus pause. The cardiac investigation was unrevealing, but continuous EEG revealed the answer. The episodes of mild tachycardia were associated with seizures from the left temporal region, whereas those with bradycardia were associated with independent seizures from the right temporal region. The case stands as a stark reminder to remain vigilant of seizures in high-risk patients, especially as a cause for paroxysmal autonomic changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".