Steelpan fundamental frequency estimation through audio feature extraction and deep neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The estimation of fundamental frequency, or pitch, is a fundamental task in computational audio analysis with a variety of applications. Steelpan audio has proven difficult for general pitch detection methods CRéPE and pYin. CRéPE is a method that uses a deep convolutional neural network to perform pitch estimation directly from the audio signal while pYIN is a digital signal processing-based approach. Audio feature extraction is the process of using digital signal processing techniques to extract low level audio information from signals. Combining audio feature extraction with logistic regression is currently the best performing steelpan pitch estimation method, but the efficacy of using deep neural networks in lieu of traditional machine learning algorithms has yet to be determined. This paper compares the performance and computational requirements of a deep neural network-based architecture against logistic regression as well as the established pYIN and CRéPE pitch detection methods to determine which method is the most accurate and efficient. All of these methods are evaluated on a test dataset containing one-hit audio samples from several distinct sounding steelpans. Generalization to other steelpans is assessed by including samples in the test dataset from steelpans for which no samples are in the training dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".