MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215372910 · doi:10.4103/2468-8827.330645

Canada India Healthcare Summit 2021

2021· article· en· W3215372910 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vaikuntam I. Lakshmanan, Arun Chockalingam, Sandhiya Kalyanasundaram

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Noncommunicable Diseases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoProcess Research Ortech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSummitGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceHealth carePublic administrationPandemicEconomic growthCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Public relationsMedicineGeographyDiseaseLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canada India Health-care Summit 2021, (“CIHS 2021”), is the 3 rd Summit, focusing on healthcare, organized by Canada India Foundation, as part of an ongoing series of thematic Canada India Forums, to highlight opportunities for collaboration between Canada and India in key strategic sectors and make public policy recommendations to the respective governments. The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network and the Consulate General of India in Toronto were co-organizers of the Summit. CIHS 2021 was focused on three themes: (1) artificial intelligence and its contribution to overcome COVID-19, (2) biotechnology and its contribution to overcome COVID-19, and (3) pandemic responses and initiatives. The Summit was held on May 20, 2021– May 21, 2021, and was preceded by three webinars. More than 60 healthcare experts and government leaders spoke at the Summit, to nearly 500 virtual attendees. A full report of the Summit with specific policy recommendations was made to the Canadian and Indian governments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Noncommunicable DiseasesSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207