Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’idée d’une tension des formes romanesques vers les structures musicales, étroitement dépendante du projet romantique de « poésie universelle progressive », s’impose progressivement, accompagnant le mouvement d’absolutisation de la musique instrumentale, à partir de la toute fin du xviiie siècle. Cet article se consacre dans un premier temps au rappel des principaux attributs de ce dispositif utopique, appelé méloforme, pour observer ensuite ce que l’on peut appeler sa sécularisation : coupé de la foi romantique en la suprématie de l’art et privé de ses racines ontologiques, le roman « musical » a tendance, après la Seconde Guerre mondiale, à adopter une attitude plus pragmatique, s’incarnant notamment en des récits moins totalisants, souvent isomorphiques d’opus musicaux singuliers. Dans la période récente, avec des romans tels que Le temps où nous chantions de Richard Powers, Apologie de la fuite de Léonid Guirchovitch, Confiteor de Jaume Cabré ou encore Central Europe de William T. Vollmann, il semble que l’on assiste à une « renaissance » de fictions complexes et ambitieuses, polyphoniques et réflexives, renouant, sans pour autant revenir à l’ensemble de la doctrine romantique, avec l’idée d’une idéalité musicale du texte littéraire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.044 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".