Distinctive roles between rumen epimural and content bacterial communities on beef cattle feed efficiency: A combined analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rumen content-associated (RC) and epithelial tissue-attached (RT) bacterial communities are composed of different phylotypes and play distinctive roles. This study aimed to compare the composition of the RT and RC bacterial communities of steers differing in feed efficiency. The microbiota of RT and RC samples collected from sixteen beef steers with high or low residual feed intake (RFI) were analyzed through sequencing of partial 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were the predominant phyla and Prevotella was the most abundant genus in both RC and RT bacterial communities. In total, 19 OTUs of the RC samples and 19 OTUs of the RT samples were differentially abundant (DA) between H-RFI and l-RFI steers. Among them, a common DA OTU belonged to Prevotella genus was identified in both RC and RT samples, making it the potential key microbial marker for indicating feed efficiency of steers. The co-occurrence of the DA OTUs among RT and RC samples suggest the importance of these two communities function as a complete system in influencing host feed efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".